Home Forums General Discussion Interesting recommendations

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #300612
    lynnie_sydney
    Participant

    Came across this – in the latest ACR 2008 recommendations on the use of DMARD's in http://www.rheumatology.org. It is the interval recommended for bloodwork to be taken when using non-biologic DMARDs for RA. I thought the recommendations for minocycline were the most interesting. Seemed to me to underscore its relative benign-ness. May be useful for those attempting to persuade their doc to prescribe it. I have saved this page as a pdf – may also be useful for some to look at the site and the recommendations in total.Lynnie   

    Be well! Lynnie

    Palindromic RA 30 yrs (Chronic Lyme?)
    Mino 2003-2008 100mg MWF - can no longer tolerate any tetracyclines
    rotating abx protocol now. From Sep 2018 MWF - a.m. Augmentin Duo 440mg + 150mg Biaxsig (roxithromycin). p.m. Cefaclor (375mg) + Klacid 125mg + LDN 3mg + Annual Clindy IV's
    Diet: no gluten, dairy, sulphites, low salicylates
    Supps: 600mg N-AC BID, 1000mg Vit C, P5P 40mg, zinc picolinate 60mg, Lithium orotate 20mg, Magnesium Oil, Bio-identical hormones (DHEA + Prog + Estrog)

    #315168
    SusanSD
    Participant

    Thanks Lynnie for sharing. I find it interesting that hydroxychloroquine (generic for Plaquenil) also seems relatively harmless in terms of bloodwork follow-up but actually, one needs to have eyes checked while taking it. I was told every 6 months when I first started taking it, but I think I recently saw a once a year recommendation – maybe by ACR.

    #315169
    Joe M
    Participant

    I read the whole PDF on the ACR website, and it makes no mention of follow-up bloodwork for biologics.  I wonder why? 

    #315170
    lynnie_sydney
    Participant

    Yes Joe, interesting. I could not find a reason for non-mention of lab intervals for biologics either. Yet the whole article is on both. Lynnie

    Be well! Lynnie

    Palindromic RA 30 yrs (Chronic Lyme?)
    Mino 2003-2008 100mg MWF - can no longer tolerate any tetracyclines
    rotating abx protocol now. From Sep 2018 MWF - a.m. Augmentin Duo 440mg + 150mg Biaxsig (roxithromycin). p.m. Cefaclor (375mg) + Klacid 125mg + LDN 3mg + Annual Clindy IV's
    Diet: no gluten, dairy, sulphites, low salicylates
    Supps: 600mg N-AC BID, 1000mg Vit C, P5P 40mg, zinc picolinate 60mg, Lithium orotate 20mg, Magnesium Oil, Bio-identical hormones (DHEA + Prog + Estrog)

    #315171
    Suzanne
    Participant

    Because they assume you are also on a DMARD that would need labs?   Mtx does the heavy-lifting in every biologic study I've ever seen.

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

    #315172
    Joe M
    Participant

    Suzanne, may I ask what you mean?  By “heavy lifting” are you saying that with a MTX/Biologic combo that the main benefit is derived from MTX?   Biologic monotherapy is becoming more common, and some studies show it to be as effective as MTX/Biologic combo.  Biologic therapy is usually only initiated after an inadequate response to MTX anyway.  It is true that MTX is still considered the gold standard of treatment. 

    #315173
    Suzanne
    Participant

    That is exactly what I am saying.  That is my opinion, based on studies I have seen.   There is a biologic study that shows a certain biologic works the same as a placebo in children.

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

    #315174
    Suzanne
    Participant

    My opinion is also that once the biologic is added to the mtx, suddenly there is perceived to be an adequate response, whether things really changed or not.  ACR20, ACR50, ACR70.  None of that is remission, is it?

    I'm feeling very opinionated today LOL.

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

    #315175
    Joe M
    Participant

    Please post a couple links, I am always interested in biologic studies.  Thanks.

    #315176
    Joe M
    Participant

    [user=18]Suzanne[/user] wrote:

    My opinion is also that once the biologic is added to the mtx, suddenly there is perceived to be an adequate response, whether things really changed or not.  ACR20, ACR50, ACR70.  None of that is remission, is it?

    I'm feeling very opinionated today LOL.

    That's the great thing about double-blind studies.  Perception plays no part because the biologic being studied is compared against controls to eliminate the placebo effect.  I don't know the specifics of what ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 are – but I do know what clinical remission is because I see it every day.

    Nothing wrong with having opinions! 

    #315177
    Suzanne
    Participant

    http://www.druglib.com/abstract/ru/ruperto-n_arthritis-rheum_20070900.html

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

    #315178
    Suzanne
    Participant

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17382113?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

    Another peds study.  10 patients.  One death.  Symptoms came back in others.  But they still conclude there is some benefit.

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

    #315179
    Joe M
    Participant

    [user=18]Suzanne[/user] wrote:

    http://www.druglib.com/abstract/ru/ruperto-n_arthritis-rheum_20070900.html

    CONCLUSION: While infliximab at 3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg showed durable efficacy at 1 year, achievement of the primary efficacy end point at 3 months did not differ significantly between infliximab-treated and placebo-treated patients. Safety data indicated that the 6-mg/kg dose may provide a more favorable risk/benefit profile. These results warrant further investigation in children with JRA.

    My comments: “Durable efficacy at 1 year” – not at three months – so it took a while for it to kick in.

    #315180
    Joe M
    Participant

    [user=18]Suzanne[/user] wrote:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17382113?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

    Another peds study.  10 patients.  One death.  Symptoms came back in others.  But they still conclude there is some benefit.

    CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab had an acceptable toxicity profile in this group of patients with severe, refractory autoimmune diseases, although there were three serious infections and one patient death. Rituximab appears to be beneficial for patients with refractory autoimmune diseases and may reduce corticosteroid exposure. Although rituximab therapy provided a durable clinical benefit for some patients in this population, other patients had reemergence of their underlying autoimmune disease.

    My Comments – Rituximab is not an anti-TNF biologic, it is a B Cell inhibitor from the cancer world.  Still “beneficial for patients with refractory autoimmune diseases”…

    #315181
    Suzanne
    Participant

    [user=20]Joe M[/user] wrote:

    [user=18]Suzanne[/user] wrote:

    http://www.druglib.com/abstract/ru/ruperto-n_arthritis-rheum_20070900.html

    CONCLUSION: While infliximab at 3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg showed durable efficacy at 1 year, achievement of the primary efficacy end point at 3 months did not differ significantly between infliximab-treated and placebo-treated patients. Safety data indicated that the 6-mg/kg dose may provide a more favorable risk/benefit profile. These results warrant further investigation in children with JRA.

    My comments: “Durable efficacy at 1 year” – not at three months – so it took a while for it to kick in.

    Joe, they stopped the placebo at 14 weeks.  Maybe it would have kicked in a year, too.  Guess we'll never know.  According to our ped rheum, they had “a really good placebo.”

    Mom of teen daughter with Poly JIA since age 2. Current med: azithromycin 250 mg MWF.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

The topic ‘ Interesting recommendations’ is closed to new replies.